Skip to main content

Why Do Non‑Gun Owners Want to Ban Law‑Abiding Citizens From Owning Firearms? My Thoughts.

Featured image for Why Do Non‑Gun Owners Want to Ban Law‑Abiding Citizens From Owning Firearms? My Thoughts.

Why Do Non‑Gun Owners Want to Ban Law‑Abiding Citizens From Owning Firearms?

By Gregg Kielma Tactical K Training and Firearms

10/14/2026

People who don’t own firearms often look at gun ownership through a completely different lens than those of us who live with firearms as part of our daily reality. The divide isn’t just political, it’s cultural, emotional, and shaped by personal experience. And that divide is exactly why many non‑gun owners push for bans that target law‑abiding citizens, not criminals.

A major reason is fear. Not fear of us, but fear of the unknown. If someone has never handled a firearm, never taken a safety class, never been around responsible gun owners, their entire understanding of guns comes from headlines and Hollywood. They see violence on the news and assume the tool, not the criminal, is the root cause. When you don’t understand something, it’s easy to believe eliminating it will eliminate the danger.

Another factor is trust. Many non‑gun owners simply don’t trust the general public with firearms because they don’t trust themselves with firearms. If they feel uncomfortable or unsafe around guns, they project that discomfort onto everyone else. Instead of learning how firearms work or how responsible owners train, they assume the safest option is to restrict ownership entirely.

There’s also a misconception that gun laws primarily affect criminals. In reality, criminals ignore gun laws by definition. Every new restriction, ban, or regulation lands squarely on the shoulders of people like me, the ones who pass background checks, follow the rules, secure our firearms, and take training seriously. But for people who don’t own guns, that distinction isn’t obvious. They see “more laws” as “more safety,” even though the data consistently shows that lawful gun owners are not the ones committing violent crimes.

Cultural distance plays a huge role too. Firearms mean different things to different people. To me, they represent self‑reliance, personal protection, discipline, and responsibility. To someone who has never touched one, they may represent danger or chaos. When two groups live in completely different realities, it’s easy for one group to assume the other’s lifestyle is unnecessary or extreme.

Finally, some people believe banning firearms will create a safer society because they’ve never had to think about protecting themselves. They rely on police response times, social norms, or the idea that “bad things happen to other people.” But those of us who carry understand that safety is a personal responsibility. We don’t outsource it. We prepare for the worst so we can protect ourselves and the people we love.

As a firearms instructor and legal firearms owner, most non‑gun owners who support bans aren’t acting out of malice, they’re acting out of misunderstanding. They don’t see the discipline, training, and responsibility that define lawful gun ownership. They only see the tragedies caused by criminals. And until more people understand the difference, law‑abiding citizens will continue to be unfairly targeted by policies that do nothing to stop the actual problem.